di Nicolò Migheli
Sono anni che i paesi si preparano alla cyber war, alla difesa da attacchi informatici della rete e dei sistemi di controllo ad essa collegati. Hanno istituito comandi unificati, assunto giovani smanettatori, esperti di sistemi di antivirus, con la paura che succeda come in Iran dove il virus Stuntnext pare abbia messo out of use of nuclear centrifuges.
If you go as the Americans tell, it took twenty-three that a soldier in an American base in Afghanistan has slipped a CD into a computer file is downloaded 250,000 sensitive then delivered to WikiLeaks . If it had happened, but the question is legitimate, is proof that the U.S. has a major problem in protecting data.
Julian Assange, the creator, or perhaps just the human image of the site promises that spread files to the Russian Federation and U.S. banks. Minister Frattini said that we are facing September 11 diplomacy. Berlusconi heading the information concerning him as a result of reading newspapers on the left.
He knows, however, that the U.S. Embassy cable undermine the most important assets of a person: trust. An intangible asset that underlie all human relationships, from those closest to those of business. What is certain is that November 28, 2010 is a watershed date. Those who study the history of this century, writes about diplomacy and post-ante Wiki Wiki.
Paradoxically, the facts of these days they agree to Nikita Khrushchev, when JFK proposed to abolish the secret services, the news reported that their early morning one could read the newspapers. The epiphany of WikiLeaks sparked enthusiasm among the public and the press. For the first time they could have first-hand news.
The network is shown at its best, the place of information without censorship, digital democracy to become real in that it determines the facts. Everyone can draw on those files, everyone can read them if they know English or have a good translator.
Too bad it's an illusion. Each file is a raw data, that alone says little. Once again we must learn to contextualize the data, which is known because it was written, which describes reality as it is connected with others and with the events preceding, who the author is and why he wrote the statement at that time. Again there is a need for specialists to make that file information. Similarly skills needed to build a secure reliable Wikipedia entry. They are the network and social networking sites, such as horizontal imagined that give the illusion to overcome distance.
Anyone can start a blog, much more than simply write a note on Facebook and discuss with anyone, discuss, review or suppress the Nobel Prize in office. The interactivity of the medium allows you to communicate with a high number of people receiving advice, approvals or rejections. An electronic agora, for many, satisfy the need for challenge and leadership.
The French anthropologist Françoise Héritier argues that our time is characterized by the disappearance of the principle authority-prior art, ie all cultures were formed by sedimentation time and those born before, only for this reason and for having gained experience over time and culture, is authoritative.
Today it is no longer the case, change, innovation, make sure that the earlier date is no longer a value. Obsolescence is transmitted from objects to people. Even more in the network where the domain of the medium is increasingly in the hands of young people, in a universe where they can reclaim their authority.
Who has not arrived for these vehicles, more and more people a certain age, they live as virtual mistaken for the space of unreality or worse instead of gossip. Except that today we should redefine the concept of reality. How many initiatives created in the network are then landed in the "reality" sensitive? Before they materialize, perhaps with marches and demonstrations, they were unreal?
why are people today who go to those that require network forms of participatory democracy. A generation, not as master, but cultural-anthropological, that experimenting with forms of supposed "equality" on the web would then transfer them into political life.
Many of these, although members of political parties, ill bear form of delegation, they tend not to recognize the authority of the leadership who, perhaps, have helped to create. Perhaps it is the traditional form of politics with its rituals, internal elections, which is no longer able to represent the concerns and the desire for change.
Especially in the center-left, where the historical tendency to factionalism today is in addition to the new condition. And this is the principal political party that just love the gifts is pushing for a continuous change of leadership. The charisma also feeds on separation, measuring, how you can recreate it today if the leader is a contact Fb? And Fb made unique vehicle for dialogue with its minimum even disputing facts or opinions on his person?
Questa generazione vorrebbe una democrazia partecipata o meglio una deliberativa. Giusto, solo che molti la scambiano per l'assemblearismo inconsistente degli anni '70. Democrazia partecipata e ancor più quella deliberativa si nutrono di strumenti formalizzati, metodi morbidi per gruppi forti, come titolava un seminario di Sardegna Democratica. Significa comunque avere competenze, rispettare i tempi e i ruoli, esprimere proposte, operare scambi, vivere interazioni e assumere decisioni; che poi vanno accettate e difese proprio perché prese insieme.
Se i partiti accettassero queste nuove forme democratiche forse il loro essere vissuti come distanti, incapaci di lettura della Actually, it would change. Could again become a place where people live, account, public affairs.
Cyclone WikiLeaks will not only change diplomacy, the need for transparency, the protagonist of the physical places where people will express themselves. If the parties if they are not, too bad for them. Democracy, freedom and participation need to find other places to express themselves.
Original article on www.sardegnademocratica.it of 01 December 2010.
0 comments:
Post a Comment